Alternate Timeline: Wealth, Innovations, and Science in the White Republic

Individual Wealth and the Economy

In our real history, some of the world’s greatest fortunes were built not only by European-descended Americans, but also by immigrants and minorities who brought new ideas, hustle, and market creation.

Think of tech entrepreneurs like Jerry Yang (Yahoo, Taiwanese-American), Sergey Brin (Google, Russian-Jewish immigrant), or Black business titans like Madam C.J. Walker (the first female self-made millionaire in America).

In the White Republic timeline, wealth would concentrate more narrowly in the hands of old Anglo and Western European families.

The nation would still have titans like Rockefeller, Carnegie, and later Gates or Bezos, but the middle layers of immigrant-driven entrepreneurship would be missing.

This means fewer small businesses, fewer fresh consumer industries, and a greater tendency toward wealth concentration at the top. By 2025, the Republic might resemble Europe’s older aristocratic model—wealthy dynasties dominating finance, energy, and land, with less churn and fewer rags-to-riches stories.
—
Innovation and Technology

The U.S. historically dominated the 20th and 21st centuries in part because of immigrant scientists and engineers—Albert Einstein (German Jewish), Enrico Fermi (Italian), Andrew Grove (Hungarian, Intel), Elon Musk (South African), Sundar Pichai (Indian, Google), and so on.

Without waves of Asian and Latino immigrants, the U.S. tech sector would be smaller and slower.

Silicon Valley likely never emerges as the global tech hub; instead, by 2025, the world’s leaders in AI, biotech, and clean energy would be China, India, Nigeria, and Brazil.

America would still innovate, but largely in fields tied to its European roots: agriculture machinery, aerospace, heavy industry. The big “tech revolutions” (internet, smartphones, social media, AI) would have been pioneered abroad.
—
Science and Research

In real history, America became the global leader in science by recruiting talent from everywhere—Jewish refugees from Nazi Europe, Asian students in engineering and medicine, Black innovators in chemistry, physics, and mathematics.

In the alternate timeline:

Universities like Harvard, MIT, and Stanford would remain prestigious, but they would lack the brilliant global minds that shaped them.

Medical research would lag, since so many breakthroughs (in cancer biology, gene editing, vaccines) came from immigrant scientists.

Space exploration would still occur (NASA remains strong), but the cutting-edge technologies behind it—semiconductors, robotics, computing—would be far behind rivals.

By 2025, the Republic might still send astronauts into orbit, but China and India would dominate lunar bases, Mars missions, and global satellite networks.
—
Global Comparison by 2025

Wealth: The U.S. is still rich, but wealth is older, more concentrated, and less dynamic.

Innovation: America is a follower, not a leader, in new tech. Silicon Valley is a quiet industrial park compared to bustling tech hubs in Lagos, Mumbai, and Shenzhen.

Science: The Republic funds research, but its Nobel prizes are fewer, its labs less cutting-edge, and its global influence diminished.